Cumulative semantic interference as learning
نویسندگان
چکیده
When aphasic individuals name pictures in a blocked-cyclic naming paradigm, they produce more semantic and omission errors when the repeatedly named items come from a single semantic category, relative to when the items are from different categories, an effect known as cumulative semantic interference. This effect is magnified in Broca’s aphasics and increases as patients repeatedly cycle through the pictures in each block (Schnur, Schwartz, Brecher, & Hodgson, 2006). A similar phenomenon manifests in non-aphasic populations as comparatively increased naming latencies for pictures from a single category (e.g. Howard, Nickels, Coltheart, & Cole-Virtue, 2006; Schnur et al., 2006). We propose a model in which incremental learning occurs during naming and is realized as weight change within the lexical system (e.g. Gordon & Dell, 2003), thereby producing cumulative semantic interference. To test our hypothesis that incremental learning alone could produce interference, we built a two-layer neural network with a distributed semantic input layer and a lexical output layer (Fig. 1a). We simulated blocked-cyclic naming as repeated access of lexical representations through semantic features with continued application of the error-based learning algorithm by which we initially trained the network.
منابع مشابه
The dark side of incremental learning: a model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production.
Naming a picture of a dog primes the subsequent naming of a picture of a dog (repetition priming) and interferes with the subsequent naming of a picture of a cat (semantic interference). Behavioral studies suggest that these effects derive from persistent changes in the way that words are activated and selected for production, and some have claimed that the findings are only understandable by p...
متن کاملCompetitor Activation and Semantic Interference: Evidence from Combined Phonological and Semantic Similarity
Incremental learning explanations state that semantic interference is driven by activation levels of competitors. To explore nonsemantic contributions to interference, we examined the combined and separate effects of facilitatory phonological form preparation and semantic relatedness in a blocked cyclic picture naming procedure. Phonological similarity was facilitatory when tested separately, b...
متن کاملSingle-word predictions of upcoming language during comprehension: Evidence from the cumulative semantic interference task.
Comprehenders predict upcoming speech and text on the basis of linguistic input. How many predictions do comprehenders make for an upcoming word? If a listener strongly expects to hear the word "sock", is the word "shirt" partially expected as well, is it actively inhibited, or is it ignored? The present research addressed these questions by measuring the "downstream" effects of prediction on t...
متن کاملThe Effect of Semantic Mapping as a Vocabulary Instruction Technique on EFL Learners with Different Perceptual Learning Styles
Traditional and modern vocabulary instruction techniques have been introduced in the past few decades to improve the learners’ performance in reading comprehension. Semantic mapping, which entails drawing learners’ attention to the interrelationships among lexical items through graphic organizers, is claimed to enhance vocabulary learning significantly. However, whether this technique suits all...
متن کاملNeuropsychological Decomposing Stroop Interference Into Different Cognitive Monitoring; An Exploratory Factor Analysis
Introduction: There are two alternative explanations of the Stroop phenomenon. Several studies have revealed that the difference in performance on congruent and incongruent trials can arise from response interference. On the contrary, many authors have claimed that Stroop interference might occur at earlier processing stages related to semantic or conceptual encoding. The present study aims to ...
متن کامل